tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Request for DLT value
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:26:51 -0700
On Apr 5, 2017, at 4:58 AM, Selvig, Bjorn <b.selvig () ti com> wrote:
We would like to support this new header also with pcap format. Our tools currently supports pcap format only. Option 1 (single DLT value) sounds a bit simpler. It allows for sniffing of more than one protocol at a time even with pcap format If I understand correctly, for example sniffing of BLE and 802.15.4 packets simultaneously. As a first step, is it OK to go for a single DLT for this proposed header?
Anything's OK as long as I don't have to spend any time supporting it. If somebody else wants to handle this DLT, go ahead. I won't spend any more time on it, either here or in tcpdump or in Wireshark; life's too short to deal with these "multiple types of link layer" LINKTYPE_/DLT_ values. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Request for DLT value Selvig, Bjorn (Apr 04)
- Re: Request for DLT value Guy Harris (Apr 04)
- Re: Request for DLT value Selvig, Bjorn (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Request for DLT value Selvig, Bjorn (Apr 04)
- Re: Request for DLT value Guy Harris (Apr 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Request for DLT value Guy Harris (Apr 05)
- Re: Request for DLT value Selvig, Bjorn (Apr 04)
- Re: Request for DLT value Guy Harris (Apr 04)