tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: DLT_ request


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 21:49:09 -0800

On Dec 12, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Scott Deandrea <sdeandrea () apple com> wrote:

The bus number is 0 based and the port numbers are 1 based.

So if there are fewer than 6 ports in the route, the unused nibbles will be zero.

I decided to implement isochronous transfers today and changed the structure slightly:
struct
{
   // Control information
   uint32_t frameHeaderLength;  // 28

   // Frame information
   uint32_t frameLength;   // Amount of data sent/received this frame
   uint32_t frameStatus;    // IOReturn result of the I/O this frame 
   uint64_t frameNumber; // Frame number on which this was scheduled/executed by the controller
   uint64_t ioTimestamp;  // Time in which the frame completed
} __attribute__((packed, aligned (sizeof(uint32_t))));   

Therefore, the isochronous format for a request with type kAppleUSBHostPacketFilterRequestComplete is as follows:
Link Header
padding, if required to force 4-byte alignment
Isochronous Frame[0] Header (frameHeaderLength bytes in length)
Isochronous Frame[0] Data (frameLength bytes)
…
padding, if required to force 4-byte alignment
Isochronous Frame[linkHeader.ioFrameCount - 1] Header (aligned to 4 bytes, frameHeaderLength bytes in length)
Isochronous Frame[linkHeader.ioFrameCount - 1] Data (frameLength bytes)

So the headers and data are interleaved; the padding would presumably be needed only if frameLength isn't a multiple of 
4.

Is this the final version, or should the format of a payload of a packet for an isochronous endpoint be left 
unspecified for now until it's finalized?

Also, what are the formats of the time stamps?  What are the units, and is there a specified origin or are they just 
relative to an unspecified base time?
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Current thread: