tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number


From: Denis Ovsienko <infrastation () yandex ru>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:01:03 +0400

08.02.2013, 21:55, "Michael Richardson" <mcr () sandelman ca>:
 "Denis" == Denis Ovsienko <infrastation () yandex ru> writes:
 Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and
 UDP layer.  It could apply to TCP too, perhaps.

    Denis> It looks like -T applies. I've got a working code and am
    Denis> producing a sample capture. The ZeroMQ decoding function is
    Denis> called from both tcp_print() and udp_print(), should I put it
    Denis> into an existing file or a new file? Which of license
    Denis> boilerplates then?

New file.
2-clause BSD please.

I was wrong about print-udp.c before, ZMTP/1.0 framing is TCP-only. But anyway it's a new file (pull request #50).

-- 
    Denis Ovsienko
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Current thread: