tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: vlan tagged packets and libpcap breakage


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:20:30 -0700


On Oct 31, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Ani Sinha <ani () aristanetworks com> wrote:

pcap files that already have the tags reinsrted should work with
current filter code. However for live traffic, one has to get the tags
from CMSG() and then reinsert it back to the packet for the current
filter to work.

*Somebody* has to do that, at least to packets that pass the filter, before they're handed to a libpcap-based 
application, for programs that expect to see packets as they arrived from/were transmitted to the wire to work.

I.e., the tags *should* be reinserted by libpcap, and, as I understand it, that's what the

        #if defined(HAVE_PACKET_AUXDATA) && defined(HAVE_LINUX_TPACKET_AUXDATA_TP_VLAN_TCI)
                ...
        #endif

blocks of code in pcap-linux.c in libpcap are doing.

Now, if filtering is being done in the *kernel*, and the tags aren't being reinserted by the kernel, then filter code 
stuffed into the kernel would need to differ from filter code run in userland.  There's already precedent for that on 
Linux, with the "cooked mode" headers; those are synthesized by libpcap from the metadata returned for PF_PACKET 
sockets, and the code that attempts to hand the kernel a filter goes through the filter code, which was generated under 
the assumption that the packet begins with a "cooked mode" header, and modifies (a copy of) the code to, instead, use 
the special Linux-BPF-interpreter offsets to access the metadata.

The right thing to do here would be to, if possible, do the same, so that the kernel doesn't have to reinsert VLAN tags 
for packets that aren't going to be handed to userland.

And, yes, if that should be done for some interfaces with some kernel versions but not all interfaces for all kernel 
versions, there would need to be a way for libpcap to ask whether it's necessary.  Is it necessary on any interfaces 
*before* the kernel change in question?
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers


Current thread: