tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Best OS / Distribution for gigabit capture?
From: Darren Reed <darren.reed () oracle com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:38:29 -0800
On 5/02/11 11:20 PM, M. V. wrote:
hi, as i mentioned in my previous mail, (with the title: "HUGE packet-drop") i'm having problem trying to dump gigabit traffic on harddisk with tcpdump on Debian5.0. i tried almost everything but got no success. so, i decided to start-over: *) if anyone has experience on successful gigabit capture, what combination of "Operating-System / Distribution / Kernel Version / libpcap version / ..." do you suggest for maximum zero-packet-loss capture?
What are you going to do with the packets? Can you process the packets that you capture with few enough CPU cycles that you never cause backlog? If the time you spend dealing with the packets that you capture is larger than the average time between packets, then it does not matter if the first 1000 or 10000 packets are not lost, eventually you will reach a point where the buffers fill and you drop packets. Which is to say that the equation is just as much about what happens when libpcap returns and you have your packets in buffers than what happens in the kernel. Darren - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Best OS / Distribution for gigabit capture? M. V. (Feb 05)
- Re: Best OS / Distribution for gigabit capture? Guy Harris (Feb 06)
- Re: Best OS / Distribution for gigabit capture? Fabian Schneider (Feb 07)
- Re: Best OS / Distribution for gigabit capture? Rick Jones (Feb 07)
- Re: Best OS / Distribution for gigabit capture? Darren Reed (Feb 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Best OS / Distribution for gigabit capture? M. V. (Feb 08)