tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: forces (and sctp) patch
From: Darren Reed <Darren.Reed () Sun COM>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:49:33 +0100
On 18/01/2010 9:27 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
"Darren" == Darren Reed<Darren.Reed () Sun COM> writes:Darren> This kind of change to the defaul behaviour warrants bumping Darren> the version number from 4.x to 5.x because this is a Darren> significant change in the output of Yes, this is why I ask, "now?" Darren> I'm curious about what the motivation is for splitting the Darren> timestamp and packet data onto separate lines is. I think it just kinda happened. I would have to go back and look at who did what... I think that it does not occur in IP/TCP, but it does in IP/SCTP.
As far as tcpdump 4.x goes, I'd consider that a bug in IP/SCTP printing. Darren - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- forces (and sctp) patch Michael Richardson (Jan 10)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch Darren Reed (Jan 11)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch sthaug (Jan 11)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch Michael Richardson (Jan 12)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch Darren Reed (Jan 18)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch Michael Richardson (Jan 18)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch Darren Reed (Jan 19)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch sthaug (Jan 19)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch Gert Doering (Jan 19)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch Guy Harris (Jan 19)
- Re: forces (and sctp) patch sthaug (Jan 11)