Re: About some libpcap patches

[Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>]

Michael Richardson <mcr <at> sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> wrote:
> > > > > > "Luis" == Luis Martin <luis.mgarc <at> gmail.com> writes:
>     >>> I got interested in libpcap's code, so I browsed and then
>     >>> submitted a couple patches to the sourceforge.net patch system
>     >>> last week (I'll probably check it out some more, but I haven't
>     >>> had more time).
>
>     >> In my [little] experience this is the best place to post patches
>     >> to, even if the web site tell it different :-)
>
>     Luis> I agree, the website should probably tell people to send
>     Luis> patches to both, sourceforge and the list. What do you think?
>
>   It's best if people post the patch to the sourceforge site if they
> want, as it is more likely that the patch is intact.
>   However, it's very important to post a note to the list explaining
> what and why.

Well, for these two patches, are my descriptions good over there? I 
think I explained it well enough, just in the wrong place :)

Sorry if this thread gets badly threaded, I'm not subscribed to 
tcpdump-workers so I had to copy-and-paste.  Please CC on any reply.

Thanks,
Kris Katterjohn
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.