tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: pcap format / standard(s)


From: Carter Bullard <carter () qosient com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:45:55 -0400

Hey Jesse,
Well, the wiki actually doesn't have any rights to the content
on the particular page that you are interested in using, and
I'm interested that they aren't meeting the BSD licensing requirement
that tcpdump is released under, as it is the actual license that applies.
Having a link to tcpdump.org may be adequate for all parties, so it
is not really an issue.

The Cable Labs document, does reference tcpdump.org, but should
have a  BSD copyright statement somewhere on the pcap file
description page, if it were worried about copyright infringement.

The wiki actually states that "Original content on this site is available
under the GNU General Public License", and they make no distinction
as to what is "Original".  So really nothing on the specific page would
be covered under the GNU License.

Of course all of the above is subject to opinion and debate, as there
is little or no case law to substantiate any claim that could come up.
All of course my opinion, and I am,  of course, not a lawyer, so, all
disclaimers do apply ;o)

Carter


On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Jesse Norell wrote:

On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 11:40 -0400, Carter Bullard wrote:
Hey Jesse,
Why not just reference annex A? It is already a standard that
CALEA recognizes.  The wiki is not the first compilation of the
information you're interested in referencing (hasn't changed
since the first implementation so way back when, other than
the timestamp precision field, which is always zero anyay),

  I'm more concerned about direct cut & paste (copyright infringement)
than just compiling the info in one place; do you know if the wiki is
simply a copy of some other source?  (I've not found any other
"original" source for that exact text in a little searching.)

Your suggestion is a possibility though, I'll kick it past the group.

Thanks,
Jesse


and from the perspective of safe harbor, referencing libpcap
is not going to be helpful with CALEA, but referencing
CM-SP-CBI20.0-I01-070611 will go a good way.

Carter


Carter Bullard
CEO/President
QoSient, LLC
150 E. 57th Street Suite 12D
New York, New York 10022

+1 212 588-9133 Phone
+1 212 588-9134 Fax


On Oct 4, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Jesse Norell wrote:

Hello,


On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:31 -0700, Guy Harris wrote:

You would be correct in assuming that what is actually in use
today is

        http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LibpcapFileFormat


I'm wondering about the copyright implications of including content
from that wiki in a published standard (just like annex A of
http://www.cablemodem.com/downloads/specs/CM-SP-CBI2.0- I01-070611.pdf
has).  The wiki says, "Original content on this site is available
under
the GNU General Public License." and as best I can find, that wiki is
the original place that file format info was put together.  Having
read
the GNU General Public License, I still don't know how to properly
apply
it / what would be allowed here; but I believe I can get explicit
permission to include the content in an otherwise non-GPL work, so
I'll
just ask for that.  We're putting together a CALEA standard that
will be
publicly available; may we include content from that wiki?  Or can
anyone explain how the GPL would be applied to this situation?

Thanks,
Jesse

--
Jesse Norell
Kentec Communications, Inc.
jesse () kci net
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.


-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
--
Jesse Norell
Kentec Communications, Inc.
jesse () kci net
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.


-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.


Current thread: