tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Headroom
From: Stephen Donnelly <stephen () endace com>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:04:02 +1300
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 13:46 -0400, Harley Stenzel wrote:
Greetings-- Has the idea of headroom for libpcap-based stack applications been discussed before? The idea is to have a known amount of empty/usable space in front of the buffer given to the application by the pcap_dispatch callback, pcap_next(), or pcap_next_ex(). It looks like it'd be a ((pcap_t *)p)->headroom, which would be added to p->offset and p->bufsize for malloc. p->offset would still have to guarantee alignment for for the data, not for the beginning of the buffer. Headroom would have to be specified at pcap_open_live() or pcap_open_offline() time, so it could alter the pcap_t initialization logic. I suppose the best approach would be to make an additional variant of those functions, so the prototype changes don't ripple to other apps. Possibly have it be an additional options structure, which may be null to get the current behavior. Any thoughts?
Wouldn't work with Endace DAG cards, as libpcap accesses memory mapped packet buffers directly. If this feature is accepted into libpcap there would need to be a way to 'reject' the option, perhaps via a specific function call like pcap_setnonblock()? Stephen. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen Donnelly BCMS PhD email: sfd () endace com Endace Technology Ltd phone: +64 7 839 0540 Hamilton, New Zealand cell: +64 21 1104378 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Headroom Harley Stenzel (Oct 06)
- Re: Headroom Gianluca Varenni (Oct 06)
- Re: Headroom Harley Stenzel (Oct 06)
- Re: Headroom Gianluca Varenni (Oct 06)
- Re: Headroom Harley Stenzel (Oct 06)
- Re: Headroom Harley Stenzel (Oct 06)
- Re: Headroom Stephen Donnelly (Oct 08)
- Re: Headroom Gianluca Varenni (Oct 06)