tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump
From: David Young <dyoung () pobox com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 21:29:55 -0500
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:32:12PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
Is the cpack.c stuff useful, or potentially useful, for anything other than the radiotap stuff?
It is potentially useful, yes, for other extensible, synthetic headers where CPU and memory bandwidth need to be conserved. I cannot predict what those headers will be. Instrumentation for network stacks? (Hmm.) "Crypto meta-data" ? Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyoung () ojctech com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump David Young (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Bruce M Simpson (Sep 22)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Michael Richardson (Sep 23)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 23)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Michael Richardson (Sep 23)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 23)
- Re: x.9 branch Hannes Gredler (Sep 24)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump David Young (Sep 24)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 25)