Snort mailing list archives

Re: http_inspect missing requests


From: James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 06:21:36 -0700

Wow did I hose my analysis of that 8-|  Totally didn't even look INSIDE
the actual packet...go me!!
On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 13:42 +0100, Felix Erlacher wrote:
One packet resulting in 10 http GET requests is perfectly alright.
Here,
HTTP/1.1 pipelining is used, which enables 10 GET requests in one TCP
segment.

greets

felix

On 08/02/17 13:04, James Lay wrote:

One packet should not equal 10 HTTP GET's....something is
amiss....I
think this might be a bug.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest
Snort news!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

Current thread: