Snort mailing list archives

HTTP_PORTS and http_inspect


From: Duane Howard <duane.security () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 10:25:21 -0700

Pretty sure this has been asked, but the only reference I've found was from
2011... (http://seclists.org/snort/2011/q3/512)

Has any progress been made toward not needing to specify the HTTP_PORTS
both for rules and for the http_inspect preprocessor? I'd love to define
this in only one place to ensure both are kept in sync.

Thanks,
Duane
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

Current thread: