Snort mailing list archives

Re: Question regarding a rule


From: James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:03:41 -0600

On 2014-06-24 12:00, Charlie Egan wrote:
Cheers for both of your replies. I tried adding the to_server bit
funnily enough just before you wrote that email, still no luck
unfortunately.

Ive tried adding the detection filter on as well, still no luck with
that either! The alerts are still piling through a few minutes after,
over the period of about three seconds. As well as the time delay, Im
confused as to why there are so many alerts. Apologies, didnt mean to
email you back directly James.

Cheers

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:39 PM, James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net
[12]> wrote:

On 2014-06-24 11:26, Y M wrote:
Ok, GUI is out of the way.

I am just guessing here, but since there is no flow direction in
the
rule; only "established" without a flow direction (to_server,
from_client, etc...) Snort will alert after it flushes the tcp
sessions, I am almost sure that I read this somewhere. If you
use,
for
example, to_server, Snort would alert as soon as the content
matches
and knows that it was you (the client) who established/initiated
the
connection (through stream5) and alert based on that. However, I
stand
corrected on all of the above.

If you add the flow direction to your rule, does that change the
alerting behavior?

-------------------------

Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:09:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] Question regarding a rule
From: chas5873 () gmail com [1]
To: snort () outlook com [2]
CC: snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net [3]

Cheers for the reply mate.

Im not using a GUI, just running it in through a terminal. Its
the
only rule which its happening with so far, confusing me to say
the
least!


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Y M <snort () outlook com [4] [8]>
wrote:

Are you using a GUI or just running in console mode to view the
alerts? "Usually", in a GUI scenario, alerts are cached and
depending in refresh rates the alerts will show up. Does this
happen
only for this rule or others as well?

-------------------------

Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:17:09 +0100
From: chas5873 () gmail com [5] [1]
To: snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net [6] [2]

Subject: [Snort-sigs] Question regarding a rule

Hi guys,

Im having a bit of trouble with a rule that Im playing around
with
to detect torrent usage.

alert tcp any any -> any any (msg: "P2P torrent metafile
download";
content:"|38 64 61|"; flow:established;
classtype:policy-violation;
sid:1000001; rev:1;)

After examining the hex dumps from multiple torrents, I noticed
that
they all begin with 38 64 61, so thats where I managed to get
that
content from.

When I run Snort and download the torrent though, it doesnt
alert
me straight away, however gives me about 20 alerts about 3 - 4
minutes later.

Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this?

Cheers,

Charlie



Also try detection_filtering your sid for testing:

alert tcp any any -> any any (msg:"P2P torrent metafile download";
content:"|38 64 61|"; flow:established; classtype:policy-violation;
detection_filter: track by_dst, count 1, seconds 60; sid:1000001;
rev:1;)

Ive seen cases where if too many alerts fire on the same content
they
wont all show up at the same time.

James

No sweat..that happens.  I'm assuming that you killall -HUP snort to 
get the new rule with the detection filter yes?  How many alerts did you 
see in a minute?

James


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
http://www.snort.org


Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!


Current thread: