Snort mailing list archives

Re: .exe


From: tarik shalo <tarikshalo () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 19:36:09 +0300

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:11 AM, tarik shalo <tarikshalo () gmail com> wrote:

Hi,

I have added also the "-k none" when i started Snort and I didn't see any
difference. It started normally, "commencing packet processing".

-Thanks



On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com> wrote:

Try adding -k none to your snort startup line.

On May 6, 2013, at 4:27 PM, tarik shalo <tarikshalo () gmail com> wrote:

Hi,

Yes, it alerts on ICMP traffic at least.

Thanks

-Shalo

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com>wrote:

Sounds like a configuration problem then.  Verify that you can alert on
the simplest traffic first.

Try adding -k none to your snort startup line.


On May 6, 2013, at 3:52 PM, tarik shalo <tarikshalo () gmail com> wrote:

Hi,

I found the rule (15306) in "file-identify.rules" and removed the
"flowbits:set, file.exe" from the rule so as to match ur rule suggestion
(the following). Then I tried to download "winscp514setup.exe" from a
remote http server on the machine where Snort was running. But the rule
doesn't fire still :(

-Shalo

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com>wrote:

Try this rule:

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET $FILE_DATA_PORTS -> $HOME_NET any
(msg:"FILE-EXECUTABLE Portable Executable binary file magic detected";
flow:to_client,established; file_data; content:"MZ";
byte_jump:4,58,relative,little; content:"PE|00 00|"; within:4;
distance:-64; metadata:service http, service imap, service pop3;
classtype:policy-violation; sid:15306; rev:17;)

On May 6, 2013, at 7:59 AM, tarik shalo <tarikshalo () gmail com> wrote:


Hi,

I edited the rule based on ur comment, "Try
flow:from_server,established; and instead of the string ".exe" try
content:"|4d 5a|"; which is equivalent to the text string "MZ" found at the
beginning of most PE files."

But the rule didn't fire. Are there some executables that i can use
to test for which there are corresponding Snort rules that catch them?

-Thanks again guys for the help and lessons that i am learning from
your responses.

Shalo



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for
Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest
Snort news!







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and 
their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed 
leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. 
Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

Current thread: