Snort mailing list archives

Re: Signature Message, PP, and sid-msg.map


From: Y M <snort () outlook com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 04:38:02 +0000

Here is a partial list of the sids, I still have to look at the remaining sids and update them. 
15167,15168,16282,23493,3691,15147,11257,5693,5760,16313,15306,6467,23098,24229,255,15570,13864,8375,11192,20278,4152,5998,5999,16301,2707,23970,9646,15873,23256,16300,21849,21845,15415,15420,15184,23492,13364,17579,5710,16482,15362
 I will check the SVN, thanks for the info. YM
 CC: snort-users () lists sourceforge net
From: cummingsj () gmail com
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Signature Message, PP, and sid-msg.map
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:42:45 -0600
To: snort () outlook com

It does generate the sid-msg.map file... Can you list the aids that were not included.... There was recently a bug 
filed and fixed that dealt with certain rules not being included (fixed in SVN)

Sent from the iRoad
On Dec 2, 2012, at 6:17, Y M <snort () outlook com> wrote:




This may have been discussed before but I did not find a definitive answer or an optimal solution. I use PulledPork to 
generate VRT rules (snort.rules) and the sid-msg.map, etc. The process completes successfully. I run Snort and alerts 
start showing up, however, I do not get signature messages (sig_name in the DB table) for some rules in there. I only 
get something like, for examples: "Snort Alert [1:255:19]". This happens to a considerable amount of rules.
 
Since the rules are firing and they exist in the snort.rules file, this means that they have been processed by 
PulledPork, however, they do not have respective entries in the sid-msg.map file. I updated those manually, both in the 
database and the sid-msg.map file and now are showing up fine. As snort continues to run, I get new alerts with no 
signature message and do the updates again and so on.
 
My question(s) is, does PulledPork generate the sid-msg.map file dynamically once it is run? If so, why some rules do 
not get mapped into the file?
 
I have read in a group discussion (can't remember where!) that this is related to the reorganization of the rules and 
should go away once everything stabilizes, please correct if I am wrong.
 
This can take an effort to get rules updated to show up properly every time the rules are updated and PulledPork is 
run. 
 
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
YM
 
                                          
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
DESIGN Expert tips on starting your parallel project right.
http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!                                        
  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
BUILD Helping you discover the best ways to construct your parallel projects.
http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

Current thread: