Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule

[Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com>]

On Feb 1, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 2/1/11 1:56 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
> > That's not right.  I'll bug this on our side for our developers to take a look.  
> > Joel
> Would you consider it a bug to fail on a signal 30, if system build with targetbased, and doesn't have a targets.xml 
> file?
>
> You might ask, why send a signal 30 to reload the targets.xml file if you don't have system compiled with 
> --enable-targetbased?
>
> (freebsd sends a signal 30 is you send it a SIGUSR1)
>
> I might ask, if --enable-targetbased is NOT specified, why include the code to look for the targets.xml file?


--enable-targetbased, I thought, was on and built in by default in recent versions.  So I am not sure where the bug 
lies.  sig 30 for Snort?  Or freebsd for sending a sig 30 on a USR1?  Not sure here.

--
Joel Esler
jesler () sourcefire com
http://blog.snort.org && http://blog.clamav.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users