Snort mailing list archives

Re: [Emerging-Sigs] Multiple rule issues after upgrade


From: L0rd Ch0de1m0rt <l0rdch0de1m0rt () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:13:38 -0600

It's a Christmas Miracle!  Glad to hear that WinCo Foods is protected
again.  I was worried there for a second that I wouldn't have a place
to securely get SPAM.

-L0rd C.

P.S. Please tell me the "Win" in "WinCo" has nothing to do with Windows. ;)

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Lay, James <james.lay () wincofoods com> wrote:
Thanks for the quick responses all.  I extracted both
snortrules-snapshot-2901 and latest emerging-threats files, nuked all rules
files from my snort dir, copied the latest rules files, then completed redid
my rules section in my snort.conf file.  All is running good now…thanks
again…guess it pays to clean these out every so often.



James



From: Matthew Jonkman [mailto:jonkman () jonkmans com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:44 AM
To: Lay, James
Cc: <emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net>; <snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net>
Subject: Re: [Emerging-Sigs] Multiple rule issues after upgrade





See below:



Dec 29 08:12:01 10.21.10.2 snort[21149]: FATAL ERROR:
/usr/local/etc/snort/rules/porn.rules(24) Unknown ClassType: kickass-porn





You're using the VRT porn rules, you need to add their classifications in
there too then.

Dec 29 08:13:42 10.21.10.2 snort[21166]: FATAL ERROR:
/usr/local/etc/snort/rules/emerging-botcc.rules(41) threshold (in rule):
could not create threshold - only one per sig_id=2404000.

Dec 29 08:15:27 10.21.10.2 snort[21171]: FATAL ERROR:
/usr/local/etc/snort/rules/emerging-compromised.rules(49) threshold (in
rule): could not create threshold - only one per sig_id=2500000.

Dec 29 08:23:54 10.21.10.2 snort[21222]: FATAL ERROR:
/usr/local/etc/snort/rules/emerging-drop.rules(41) threshold (in rule):
could not create threshold - only one per sig_id=2400000.

Dec 29 08:24:20 10.21.10.2 snort[21224]: FATAL ERROR:
/usr/local/etc/snort/rules/emerging-rbn.rules(44) threshold (in rule): could
not create threshold - only one per sig_id=2406000.

Dec 29 08:24:34 10.21.10.2 snort[21226]: FATAL ERROR:
/usr/local/etc/snort/rules/emerging-tor.rules(44) threshold (in rule): could
not create threshold - only one per sig_id=2520000.





These are all likely because of the duped tor and rbn rulesets in the Dir.
Can you clear it and update?

I’ve had to disable the above rulesets to get snort running again, which is
not a really great option currently.  Using the latest 2.9.0 ET rules, and
registered 2.9.0.1 snort ruleset.





You'll have signature double coverage going this way. Highly recommend using
one or the other.



Matt

James Lay

IT Security Analyst

WinCo Foods

208-672-2014 Office

208-559-1855 Cell

650 N Armstrong Pl.

Boise, Idaho 83704



_______________________________________________
Emerging-sigs mailing list
Emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
http://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs

Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for Snort 2.4.0 through
Current!

_______________________________________________
Emerging-sigs mailing list
Emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net
http://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs

Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
http://www.emergingthreatspro.com
The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for Snort 2.4.0 through
Current!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs


Current thread: