Snort mailing list archives

Re: SID 13923 - Bad Rule


From: "evilghost () packetmail net" <evilghost () packetmail net>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:20:09 -0500

Hi Pat, thanks for rehashing what I said with more words, as if I didn't 
really quite understand what I was pointing out.  I'm a little snippy 
because I have a right to be, "you" (SourceFire, the company) just 
released a VRT subscription release (of which I pay a substantial amount 
of money for) which successfully (with the confidence of "policy 
security-ips drop") classified all valid ingress SMTP traffic with the 
exclusion of the EHLO rule, as hostile.

Forgive me if I'm not smiles and sunshine.  Honestly, I think I did 
pretty good and not lambasting "you" (SourceFire, the company) in my 
initial email for this gross oversight.

It's pretty evident in this case this subscription release wasn't 
sufficiently QA'd.  To quote you, the problem "is immediately obvious by 
looking at the rule"

-evilghost (the jerk)

Patrick Mullen wrote:
Hello, SID 13923 seems to generate quite a lot of false positives.
      

You are correct that the rule alerts on rfc-compliant traffic.  This
is immediately obvious by looking at the rule.  The rule was modified
from its previous form which had pcre:"/^HELO\x20(\x00|.\x00)/smi" to
its new form which currently has "content:"HELO "; content:!"|00|";
within:2; as part of a lot of performance changes.  Obviously, this
change does not fit the previous rule's intent due to the "!" modifier
on the content match.  A mistake was made and then lost in the mix.
Thank you for pointing it out; it will be fixed in the next release
and an additional speed increase that was realized during review will
be added to the rule.

Next time simply letting us know there is an obvious problem with the
rule without adding the "...to be a jerk..." part should be
sufficient.  ;)


Thanks,

~Patrick
  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs


Current thread: