Snort mailing list archives
so_rules broken makefile or bad tarball
From: Jeff Nathan <jeff () snort org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:40:08 -0500
I've tested both the VRT paid tarball as well as the registered users tarball, attempting to build the so_rules from source. There appears to be some brokenness in the definition of the files variable in looking for files that match the library name, only followed by an underscore and some other characters. To explain further, and provide an example, in the VRT paid tarball, there aren't any source files or header files matching web-activex. In the registered rules tarball one can find web-activex.{c|h}, but nothing that will match the shell glob web-activex_*.c . Am I missing something or are the tarballs missing files and/or the Makefiles broken? Thanks, -Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Snort-devel mailing list Snort-devel () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel
Current thread:
- so_rules broken makefile or bad tarball Jeff Nathan (Jan 13)
- Message not available
- Re: so_rules broken makefile or bad tarball Jeff Nathan (Jan 27)
- Message not available