Re: Bad Traffic rules messed up.

["evilghost () packetmail net" <evilghost () packetmail net>]

I suspect the issue is that there are no comments in bad-traffic.rules 
aside from the SF disclaimer/header except "#linux happens.  Blah" on 
line 30, which is a little out of place and non-descriptive.

-evilghost

Nigel Houghton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Richard Ullrich <rullric () utah gov> wrote:
>   
> > Seems there's a problem with the 'bad-traffic' rules...  rather a
> > 'prophetic' statement in the rules file... <G>
> >
> > "linux happens.  Blah"
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> > on
> > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> > Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> > _______________________________________________
> > Snort-sigs mailing list
> > Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
> >
> >
> >     
>
>
> Would you mind actually providing details? No idea what you are
> talking about, what the error might be, etc...
>
>   

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs