Re: Another early morning fatal warning

[Richard Bejtlich <taosecurity () gmail com>]

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Matt Olney <molney () sourcefire com> wrote:
> Damn Mondays:
>
> "Yes, the published rules are >>NOW<< 2.8.4. specific."
>
> Matt

Is it just me, or should 2.8.4 have been 2.9 instead?

Why does a sub-minor version (major.minor.sub-minor) contain so much
new functionality (specifically thinking SMB here)?

I know -- it's free; if you don't like it, tough, etc.  :)

Still, moving to 2.9 would have made it clearer to users and saved
some support time, I think.

Thank you,

Richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations 
Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of 
expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry 
leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf 
and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users