Re: Port Aggregator Tap alternatives for snort sensor

[CunningPike <cunningpike () gmail com>]

Hi Paul,

We are filtering by IP range.

CP

On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 10:29 -0400, Paul Melson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:14 AM, CunningPike <cunningpike () gmail com> wrote:
> > We have a box with a 4-port NIC into two taps - we use a separate snort
> > instance for each, using bpf filters to avoid traffic duplication. Sguil
> > ties the whole thing together.
>
> Are you using bpf filters to filter by IP src/dst or vlan id?  I'm
> interested in hearing from anyone that's using bpf filters to separate
> traffic by vlan as to how performance is, if there are any
> configuration/testing gotchas, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> PaulM


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users