Re: SnortAV?

[Jason <security () brvenik com>]

jrhendri () maine rr com wrote:
> I would agree that testing a host after the fact is inherently prone to
> error.
>
> Does anyone know of any effort to integrate IDS with scanner output to
> achieve a (potentially more accurate) result? Something like doing daily
> nessus scans and tailoring snort output to alert for systems that were
> (potentially) vulnerable as of the last scan could be beneficial.

http://www.shmoo.com/~bmc/software/honeysuckle


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users