Snort mailing list archives
Re: Why content and not uricontent?
From: Brian <bmc () snort org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:52:41 -0400
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:43:59PM +0200, Holger Mense wrote:
Now I am curios. Can someone explain me, if there are any reasons for using content over uricontent?
phf can be exploited via POST as well as GET. http inspect doesn't provide a normalized parameter detection method, so we use content to catch both GET and POST attacks. Brian ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Why content and not uricontent? Holger Mense (Apr 12)
- Re: Why content and not uricontent? Brian (Apr 13)
- Re: Why content and not uricontent? Holger Mense (Apr 21)
- Re: Why content and not uricontent? Matt Kettler (Apr 21)
- Re: Why content and not uricontent? Holger Mense (Apr 21)
- Re: Why content and not uricontent? Holger Mense (Apr 21)
- Re: Why content and not uricontent? Brian (Apr 13)