Snort mailing list archives
Re: Ethernet Tap vs Span Port
From: Wes Young <wcyoung () buffalo edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:25:57 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It just depends on how much traffic your switch see's. Spanning it def takes up some resources, so idealy a tap would be the way to go. We use netoptics, and they seem to do a good job (although we use their fiber taps, not the 10/100's). Best thing you can do is try out the spanning port and monitor your stats, if your switch starts to fail, get a tap. Depending on the size of the network, I used to use a small hub inbetween the fw and core switch on 10/100's and it seems to work just as well, especially if you are only working with a single LAN, or a small switch you have laying around that can be just used for spanning out the traffic to offload the gw. (Simple techniques, if you already have the resources). Victor.Correia () international gc ca wrote: | Hi All, | | I'm currently in the process of implementing Snort. I was wondering | witch of the TAP or Span port was best route to go. | | For the TAP I'm looking at these 2: Critical TAP System NCT3C1 and Net | Optics 96443 - 10/100 Port Aggregator Tap | | Does any of you used one of those? Are they good? | | For the spanning port, I was thinking of monitoring the gateway port | from my core switch to the firewall. I'm a bit concern about spanning | port, since the switch must duplicate all the incoming and outgoing | traffic of the switch, could that cause the switch to fail? the switch I | want to use for that is a Cisco 2950. | | Which of these option is the best one to implement Snort on a network to | monitor only the LAN. | | Thank for your input. | | Vic - -- Wes Young Network Security Analyst University at Buffalo GPG Key: http://saxjazman9-security.blogspot.com/2005/01/gpg-key.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB4+H1zLe0Tk6uDXYRAocuAKDCJfX+Rm7+b3kKy5fIoqjNEJmBvgCgh8Xr 3RywnqB0U5Lh96SU5lETYP8= =GoW3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Ethernet Tap vs Span Port Victor.Correia (Jan 11)
- Re: Ethernet Tap vs Span Port Wes Young (Jan 11)