Snort mailing list archives
Re: Snort max at 256 simultaneous TCP stream?
From: Edin Dizdarevic <Edin.Dizdarevic () interActive-Systems de>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:58:22 +0200
Tom Fulton wrote:
I'm just trying to get a feel for how much a sensor can scale and when you may need to add other sensors on a given subnet
I would say as soon as you begin loosing packets, what else? Regards, Edin PS: Why should one want to use Snort 1.9.x in a heavily loaded high speed network if he has 2.1.x in his hand? -- Edin Dizdarevic ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Snort max at 256 simultaneous TCP stream? Tom Fulton (Jun 26)
- RE: Snort max at 256 simultaneous TCP stream? Tom Fulton (Jun 26)
- Re: Snort max at 256 simultaneous TCP stream? Edin Dizdarevic (Jun 26)
- Re: Snort max at 256 simultaneous TCP stream? Martin Roesch (Jun 28)
- RE: Snort max at 256 simultaneous TCP stream? Tom Fulton (Jun 26)