Snort mailing list archives
RE: false positive generator
From: "Bob Walder" <bwalder () spamcop net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:08:38 +0100
Perhaps I am missing something, but why do you want to generate false positives exactly? Unless you are attempting to demonstrate how a sensor handles (or does not handle) false positives (i.e. in this case, I think you are really talking about stateless attacks, ones where the 3-way handshake has not occurred and only payload is being sent) then tools like Stick/Sneeze/Snot are not much use to you. You can check out our IDS/IPS reports at www.nss.co.uk/ids if you want to see how sensors handle stateless attacks and other types of false positives. Try using real attack traffic replayed using TCPREPLAY, or a tool like Blade IDS Informer/Firewall Informer which does the same thing but all wrapped up in a nice GUI and with plenty of pre-defined attacks included. That way, you will see some "real" attacks appearing in your database. Be aware that not ALL the test cases included with the Blade software are good - we tend to use real exploit traffic or test cases we have generated in house to ensure complete control, but IDS/Firewall Informer make the replay easy. Regards, Bob Walder Director The NSS Group
-----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net [mailto:snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net] On Behalf Of Dirk Geschke Sent: 11 February 2004 10:39 To: Matt Kettler Cc: Peggy Kam; snort-users () lists sourceforge net; Dirk_Geschke () genua de Subject: Re: [Snort-users] false positive generator Hi Matt, I think you misses something...Well, if anyone knows something that's a false positive,let the snortdevelopers know so they can fix it ASAP.Yes, that's true. But not all false positives can be eleminated. How about UDP rules searching for a special content in the payload?Are you really trying to generate _false_ positives, orjust generatealerts? Not all alerts require an actual overflow to occur..The idea is to create alerts which are recognized by the sensor but do not belong to a real attack. This is of course useful for debugging/testing/benchmarking. Think about a tool like ACID, it won't make fun to develop a new one if you have only one kind of alerts in the database...A nessus safe-mode scan should fire off at least a few alerts, although I'll admit I haven't tried it recently.Yes, but this are only a few. And you can't really test all rules. A false positive generator like "fpg" tries to build for every rule an appropiate network packet that should raise the rule to generate an alert. This alert should then be found in the logs or mucht better in the database. Since you know how the packet was built you should be able to verify that the alert information in the database are correct or not. How will you do this with only sniffing on real attacks? You must have a tcpdump running parallel to snort to see if the alerts are relatedt to the original network packet? So finally: False positive generators are very useful under certain circumstances. Best regards Dirk ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sno>> rt-usersSnort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- RE: false positive generator Bob Walder (Feb 11)
- Re: false positive generator Dirk Geschke (Feb 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: false positive generator Bob Walder (Feb 11)
- Re: false positive generator Dirk Geschke (Feb 11)