Snort mailing list archives
Rule causes a Segmentation Fault
From: SN ORT <snort_on_acid () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:41:03 -0800 (PST)
This rule causes a segmentation fault on one of my sensors. The other sensor is not affected. Both are the same version (2.0.4). alert tcp any any -> any 80 (uricontent:"%01@"; msg:"IE Web Redirect Vulnerability"; nocase;) It likes this one however: alert tcp any 80 -> any any (uricontent:"%01@"; msg:"IE Web Redirect Vulnerability"; nocase;) Not that I would use the one above. I'm only concerned with the first rule. Why is it failing? Maybe it can't handle the load at looking at every incoming HTTP packet? TIA! Cheese! Marc __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Rule causes a Segmentation Fault SN ORT (Dec 11)