Snort mailing list archives

Rule causes a Segmentation Fault


From: SN ORT <snort_on_acid () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:41:03 -0800 (PST)

This rule causes a segmentation fault on one of my
sensors. The other sensor is not affected. Both are
the same version (2.0.4). 
 
alert tcp any any -> any 80 (uricontent:"%01@";
msg:"IE Web Redirect Vulnerability"; nocase;)
 
 
It likes this one however:

alert tcp any 80 -> any any (uricontent:"%01@";
msg:"IE Web Redirect Vulnerability"; nocase;)

Not that I would use the one above. I'm only concerned
with the first rule.
Why is it failing? Maybe it can't handle the load at
looking at every incoming HTTP packet? TIA!

Cheese!
Marc


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: