Re: More explanation needed in Snort User Manual for "resp:"?

[Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>]

Jason Haar <Jason.Haar () trimble co nz> writes:

> I've looked at flexresp2, and it allows you to explicitly configure which
> interface RESET packets are set through - which is almost there. But this
> still seems like a bug to me, as I can't think of a reason why you would
> ever want the packet to leave through anything other than the interface it
> was seen on! [well, except one: TAPs - but that's pretty special case]
>
> Am I missing something here?

You have the problem space down. Asynchronous routing

-i any or -i bond0  will throw away almost any info you could.
-- 
Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
This is my signature. There are many like it but this one is mine.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users