Snort mailing list archives
Re: Portscan2, where port !=X
From: Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 14:39:00 -0400
At 12:16 PM 8/31/2003 -0500, Jade E. Deane wrote:
A very good point indeed. In fact, the sensors I'm playing around with here at home are both dual Intel Pro 200s. Can you, or someone else on the list, provide any suggestions for running snort on minimal hardware?
disable spp_portscan2, and spp_conversation. If you've got low memory, turn on the lowmem search option (it's in snort.conf but commented out by default)
I'm also curious, how can you (while snort is acting as a background alert daemon) get a sense of the packet drop rate?
kill -USR1 snort's PID and then check syslog
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Portscan2, where port !=X Jade E. Deane (Aug 30)
- Re: Portscan2, where port !=X Matt Kettler (Aug 31)
- Re: Portscan2, where port !=X Jade E. Deane (Aug 31)
- Re: Portscan2, where port !=X Matt Kettler (Aug 31)
- Re: Portscan2, where port !=X Jade E. Deane (Aug 31)
- Re: Portscan2, where port !=X Matt Kettler (Aug 31)