Snort mailing list archives
RE: Notes regarding success with snort 2.0 on low end hardware
From: "Petriz, Pablo" <ppetriz () siscat com ar>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:39:48 -0300
Hello Matt I am a "low end hardware" user too, and i want to know if you can extend your case a little bit and explain us (the non so technical users of snort) which are the pros, cons and howtos of the things you've set up to do it. "I had set up snort by disabling conversation and portscan2, used the lowmem config option and the -k none command line parameter and tuned the ruleset slightly. The process consumed a relatively meager 13mb of ram." Thank you very much PABLO
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 20:45:25 -0400 To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net From: Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com> Subject: [Snort-users] Notes regarding success with snort 2.0 on low end
hardware
I just got done upgrading my snort box to merely "low end" instead of "really low end" hardware. However, I thought some of you might find it interesting that I was successfully running snort 2.0 on an old box with relatively low packet loss (just under 0.1%) sniffing a modestly loaded 2mbit symmetric connection. I had set up snort by disabling conversation and portscan2, used the
lowmem
config option and the -k none command line parameter and tuned the ruleset
slightly. The process consumed a relatively meager 13mb of ram. I had been running this snort setup on a Pentium-133 console-only OpenBSD box, with 64mb of ram, and a realtek chipset NIC. So despite having an inefficient NIC, low end cpu and low ram, snort ran reasonably well, although it was missing a few packets here and there. Not
too shabby for such a low-end system. Kudos to Marty, Chris and the others
for making snort 2.0 still usable on the low-end setups. Now I've got it running on a 400mhz PII w/128mb and a better NIC, which is
still low end, but it's not nearly as laughable.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Notes regarding success with snort 2.0 on low end hardware Matt Kettler (Jun 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Notes regarding success with snort 2.0 on low end hardware Petriz, Pablo (Jun 17)
- RE: Notes regarding success with snort 2.0 on low end hardware Matt Kettler (Jun 17)
- RE: Notes regarding success with snort 2.0 on low end hardware Petriz, Pablo (Jun 17)