1.9.1 versus 2.0.x

[John Sage <jsage () finchhaven com>]

A long, long time ago in a galaxy far...

/* No, wait, that's not right */

Several weeks ago Erek posted something that suggested that 2.0.x has
a considerably bigger memory footprint than 1.9.1 and that if one was
running low-end hardware, 2.0.x might not be happy.

Given: Pentium 150 classic, 96mb RAM, Linux 2.4-18.5, no X, go with
snort 1.9.1 or 2.0.x?

What say ye?


- John
-- 
"You are in a twisty maze of weblogs, all alike."

    PGP key: http://www.finchhaven.com/pages/gpg_pubkey.html
Fingerprint: C493 9F26 05A9 6497 9800 4EF6 5FC8 F23D 35A4 F705


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users