Snort mailing list archives
Re: porno rules
From: Neil Dickey <neil () geol niu edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:07:08 -0500 (CDT)
Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com> wrote:
It's also inadvisable to use portscan2 and conversation preprocessors.. those are disabled by default in snort 2.0's conf.
I haven't seen that before. Why is it not advisable to use them? Just curious .... Best regards, Neil Dickey, Ph.D. Research Associate/Sysop Geology Department Northern Illinois University DeKalb, Illinois 60115 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- porno rules Bryan Irvine (Apr 29)
- Re: porno rules Matt Kettler (Apr 29)
- Re: porno rules Bryan Irvine (Apr 29)
- Broken config directive? or just me? Sam Evans (Apr 29)
- Re: Broken config directive? or just me? Matt Kettler (Apr 29)
- Re: Broken config directive? or just me? Chris Green (Apr 30)
- Re: porno rules Bryan Irvine (Apr 29)
- Re: porno rules Matt Kettler (Apr 29)
- Re: porno rules Matt Kettler (Apr 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: porno rules Neil Dickey (Apr 29)
- Re: porno rules Matt Kettler (Apr 29)