Snort mailing list archives
maybe a quick solution for web traffic and portscan 2
From: "mike Hughes" <mikehughes013 () hotmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 23:27:05 -0800
Hey guys! For people using preprocessor portscan2 and getting a lot webtrafficand have a dynamic IP address that they put into ignorehost, im using this setup and seems to be working soo far and i think it will still pick up on people scanning my system using nmap source port 53 scan? What do you guys thinks about this setup???
preprocessor portscan2-ignorehosts: $DNS_SERVERS preprocessor portscan2-ignoreports-to: 80 53 preprocessor portscan2-ignoreports-from: 80preprocessor portscan2: scanners_max 3200, targets_max 5000, target_limit 3, port_limit 9, timeout 45
_________________________________________________________________Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- maybe a quick solution for web traffic and portscan 2 mike Hughes (Mar 26)