Snort mailing list archives
RE: Re: Detecting another sniffer
From: "McCammon, Keith" <Keith.McCammon () eadvancemed com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:39:55 -0400
No, no, and no :) By their nature, promiscuous interfaces do not send packets, and would not be detected by a system that relies on captured packets for analysis. You could try something like Anti-Sniff (if it's still current), which is a promiscuous interface detection tool. Check it out at L0pht/AtStake. Cheers Keith
-----Original Message----- From: Frank Edwards [mailto:pirgah () yahoo com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:15 AM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: [Snort-users] Re: Detecting another sniffer Does SNORT detects the existence of another sniffer on a internal network ? Let's say I'm running Ethereal on a internal network. Does SNORT will detect it ? Which kind of message will appear ? Thank you in advance __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: Detecting another sniffer Frank Edwards (Oct 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: Detecting another sniffer McCammon, Keith (Oct 18)