Snort mailing list archives

Re: portscan-ignorehosts for portscan2? (was Re: Portscan from self?)


From: Erek Adams <erek () theadamsfamily net>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:50:40 -0700 (PDT)

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Bennett Todd wrote:

Would that I did. I don't see that in my snort.conf, nor
anywhere else in my (1.9.0) snort rules. What's more, I'm
having trouble tuning portscan2; it doesn't seem to be honoring
portscan-ignorehosts. The easiest way I've found to tune it down for
false-positives on legit servers is to use BPF to completely blind
snort to those servers. This seems suboptimal to me.

portscan2 uses portscan2-ignorehosts instead of portscan-ignorehosts.

As for the BPF, if you really dink with the filters, you can get very specific
on what packets to ignore.  Flags, type, ports, machines, etc...  Dig around
the tcpdump man page for a few examples.  For more complex thing, you'll need
to google for it.  Sorry, but I don't have a good link to point you at.
Anyone?

Cheers!

-----
Erek Adams
Nifty-Type-Guy
TheAdamsFamily.Net



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: