Snort mailing list archives
RE: snort performance vs traffic
From: "Tim Prendergast" <tprendergast () reserveamerica com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:22:59 -0700
I'm running Snort 1.8.6 (build 105) on Redhat 7.1, 2x9.1 scsi disks, P3-500 w/ 256mb memory (Dell Poweredge 1300). -Tim -----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net [mailto:snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net] On Behalf Of Erek Adams Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:03 AM To: Tim Prendergast Cc: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] snort performance vs traffic Tim, it sounds like you're getting bitten by an older bit of code. IIRC, that was an issue with an older version but has now been fixed. If you're not already, try the 1.8.7 release[0] and see if that helps. If you're already running it, can you give us some more details on OS and version, disk systems, etc.? ----- Erek Adams Nifty-Type-Guy TheAdamsFamily.Net ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- snort performance vs traffic Tim Prendergast (Jul 09)
- Re: snort performance vs traffic Chris Green (Jul 09)
- Re: snort performance vs traffic Erek Adams (Jul 09)
- RE: snort performance vs traffic Tim Prendergast (Jul 09)
- RE: snort performance vs traffic Erek Adams (Jul 09)
- Re: snort performance vs traffic Erek Adams (Jul 09)
- RE: snort performance vs traffic Tim Prendergast (Jul 09)
- Re: snort performance vs traffic Rob Hughes (Jul 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: snort performance vs traffic Gray . Brendan (Jul 09)