Snort mailing list archives
Re: [Hogwash-devel] Re: what is the difference between these rules!??!?!
From: allen <aef () prismnet com>
Date: 05 Aug 2002 06:44:25 -0500
Well... The solution you did below is okay, BUT... Let's look at the problem a little more closely, you may decide you want to do things a little bit different... PORN ... The idea is: "Do not allow browsers to get porn" In order to get porn, a browser has to request porn. By and large, mostly what I have seen is rules that stop the browser from requesting porn, not stopping the porn from coming in. You can do this one of two ways or both... 1. Block the DNS Lookup for the PORN Site drop udp $internal > $external <dns port> ( bad site data value(s) ) 2. Block the browser "GET http://www.badsite.com" Again, you may wish to take a closer look at Squid and SquidGuard. A Proxy can make it much EASIER to write rules that block Porn. Hogwash is really better at blocking attack signatures and viri. I'm SERIOUS. SquidGuard is probably WHAT YOU WANT for the PORN problem. That doesn't mean don't use Hogwash, just that you'd have to write LOTS OF RULES in Hogwash and you probably couldn't do a perfect job of it. Unless you knew the exact binary signature of each image that has porn on it... see.. that's what hogwash does... filters exact based on content... each individual content... With SquidGuard you can write "expressions" like "Don't let the browser request anything that sounds like "xxx". Just a few expressions like that can lock things down pretty well. Hogwash has more difficulty in rule writing for THAT PURPOSE. That is my impression of things. Hogwash = Security Tool, not exactly Anti-Porn Tool... "Not 'best' suited for that purpose" Additionally, SquidGuard already has a database of Porn sites to block... 100,000+ entries... Wanna write that many hogwash rules ? -AEF On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 02:29, funky wrote:
Hi, I'm making the test at my home using ppp0 for external interface and eth0 for internal interface. It works at all:) Can you explain my my the porn.rules ruleseare written as below: alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET 80 -> $HOME_NET any /(msg:"Game site in not allowed!!";content:"tavla";nocase;flags:A+)this is only for making alerts and loggging?!?! If i wanna block a site, i.e. www.site.com , how can it be made?!? Is the solution below is good?? Or can you tell me a better rule!? : drop tcp any any <> any any /(msg:"Game site is not allowed!!";content:"www.site.com";)thanx funky --- Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com> wrote:How are you physically configured? Is the network traffic in question running *through* your snort box (ie: the machine running snort acts as a router with 2 network cards), or alongside it? Hogwash will only work if your snort box is an in-line router, and will not work as a single-interface side-monitor connected via a hub or ethernet tap. Hogwash will only work if configured like this: internet ---- snort_hogwash_machine --- protected machine it will not work like this: internet ------ hub/tap ------ "protected" machine (not really protected) | snort_hogwash_machine. The second setup works for normal snorting, but does not work for hogwashing since the snort machine can only see the packets in question, it can't block them since it's not "in line". If the second case is your only possible configuration, your best bet is flexresp, but that works by spoofing reset packets and does not work 100% reliably. At 10:42 AM 8/3/2002 -0700, funky wrote:Hi, I'm trying to block some sites using the hogwashpatchfor Snort. I tried the rule below like the porn.rules: drop tcp $EXTERNAL_NET 80 -> $HOME_NET any / (msg:"Game site in not allowed!!";content:"tavla";nocase;flags:A+) Tyring to enter a web-site froma client, forexemplewww.tavla.com, i can enter that, why!?!??!?! i have to modify the rule like below in order toblockthe site: drop tcp any any <> any any / (msg:"Game site is not allowed!!";content:"tavla";)Now i'M not allowed to enter the sites. So do i have to modify the rules like that which i wanna apply the "drop" option!??!??! Anyone can help me in that case please?!?!? thanx funky Istanbul-------------------------------------------------------This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Hogwash-devel mailing list Hogwash-devel () lists sourceforge nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hogwash-devel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Hogwash-devel mailing list Hogwash-devel () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hogwash-devel
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- what is the difference between these rules!??!?! funky (Aug 03)
- Re: what is the difference between these rules!??!?! Matt Kettler (Aug 03)
- Re: [Hogwash-devel] Re: what is the difference between these rules!??!?! funky (Aug 05)
- Re: [Hogwash-devel] Re: what is the difference between these rules!??!?! allen (Aug 05)
- Re: [Hogwash-devel] Re: what is the difference between these rules!??!?! funky (Aug 05)
- Re: [Hogwash-devel] what is the difference between these rules!??!?! allen (Aug 05)
- Re: what is the difference between these rules!??!?! Matt Kettler (Aug 03)