Snort mailing list archives

Re: DOS MSDTC attempt


From: Kenny D <bitored2002 () yahoo com au>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:46:13 +1000 (EST)

Thanks for the reply,

So if the destination ip doesnt have 3372 open i can
write a pass rule. So why does it matter if its a
switched network or not?

Rgds,

Kenny. 

--- Andreu.Gomez () keisa intrakom com wrote: > 
If you look at that rule, you will see that the
alert is triggered when
there's a  connection to port  3372 and the payload
is bigger than 1023.
This is because there is a bug in M$ systems that
can be exploited by
sending 1024 bytes to port 3372, the M$ Distributed
Transaction
Coordinator.
The rule is:

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 3372
(msg:"DOS MSDTC attempt";
flags:A+; dsize:>1023; reference:bugtraq,4006;
classtype:attempted-dos;
sid:1408; rev:2;)

Check

http://online.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/vulns-item.pl?section=discussion&id=4006

for more details.
This doesn't mean that you are under a DOS attack,
but I would review your
snort setup, so that rule is not applied for your
users network (if you are
in a switched environment), or wrote a pass rule for
machines not running
vulnerable services.

Andreu
 

http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger
- A great way to communicate long-distance for FREE!

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: