Re: snort-current rules syntax error

[Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>]

"Sean Wheeler" <S.Wheeler () netprotect ch> writes:

> elo all,
>
>  question concerning the above....is it or will it be possible for snort to
> bypass failed rules and get on with the rest of the job while popping a "wtf
> !!??" into your logs ?

Right now, nope.  In the future, yup.

This really only bit you if you are using the snort-current rules
which should be treated with lots of respect and investigation.
-- 
Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
To err is human, to moo bovine.


_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users