Snort mailing list archives

RE: Snort & multi-port ethernet cards


From: "McCammon, Keith" <Keith.McCammon () eadvancemed com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:09:34 -0400

That's a pretty good one.  I've seen/heard-of similar problems on servers running Windows NT/2000, but never on 
anything running BSD.  I'm running four instances on FreeBSD 4.5, one on-board NIC and two Intel Pro duals.  Haven't 
tried a quad, although I think I have a Nokia quad laying around that I could try for kicks.

I'm sure you've been through this already, but I assume that ifconfig is showing all interfaces up, messages is clean, 
dmesg shows all that all four are starting (or the rc.d script is succeeding, etc.?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sevy [mailto:tsevy () epx com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Snort-Users eMail List (E-mail)
Subject: [Snort-users] Snort & multi-port ethernet cards


Running various versions of snort, in the 1.8 range, I've tried to use two
different multi-port ethernet adapters.

One is an HP ANA-6944B/TX (Adaptec OEM'd to HP), 4 x 21140

and

the other is a Znyx ZX346Q, 4 x 21143

Base systems:

1) Compaq Proliant 1850R 2x PIII cpu's, FreeBSD 4.4 & 4.5 versions

2) Compaq Proliant 1600R 2x PIII cpu's, RH Linux 7.3

In the various scenarios I have tried to use these cards, it seems that only
one port at a time will actually return packets.  Verified by running
tcpdump on the different ports (ie., it's not just snort!  the symptoms are
seen as the same when trying to run two instances of tcpdump or two
instances of snort.

It is not external to the snort systems -- If I remove the quad card and
through in distinct nic cards, then all is well.

The problem appears to be that when the same driver is used for multiple
NICS, only one of the NICS will function as necessary for snort.

I would like to find a solution to this problem, as I have a couple of quad
cards laying around, and using these I can have a single box monitoring many
internal lan segments.  Otherwise I have to request additional boxes as
sensors.

Hopefully someone else has seen/observed this, and might have a
fix/work-around/solution....





-------------------------------------------------------
                   Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
                   >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


-------------------------------------------------------
                   Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
                   >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: