Snort mailing list archives
Re: Snort Questions
From: Mike Shaw <mshaw () wwisp com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:34:42 -0500
At 08:23 AM 6/20/2002 -0400, Sandy Martin wrote:
First, after looking through the rules, I noticed a wide variety of rules for a cross section of platforms. I understand that they were written that way on purpose. My question is, is it ok to go through and edit these rules to remove all of the *nix related stuff? Our network is composed of 20 nodes. All Windows 2000 with 1 Windows 2000 Server. The server is a DC but not a web/mail, etc. server. So, I was thinking that to improve performance and reduce false positives, I could go through and edit the rules leaving only the Win32 stuff in. Is this a good route to go?
I like to keep some of those non-applicable rules running, as they can give insight into what people are trying (really noisy scanners, etc).
-Mike ------------------------------------------------------- Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Snort Questions Sandy Martin (Jun 20)
- Re: Snort Questions Mike Shaw (Jun 20)
- RE: Snort Questions Michael Steele (Jun 20)