Snort mailing list archives

Re: Curse of the cmd.exe


From: Chris Keladis <Chris.Keladis () cmc cwo net au>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:30:20 +1000

Sam Evans wrote:

I was wondering if there is any way to alter a signature (maybe by using the
dynamic rules?) to have it record when a cmd.exe attempt on port 80 is
followed by the server's 200 OK ?
>
Does anyone have suggestions for a solution?  Is there one?  It seems like
it should be really easy to do.. in theory..

I'd say you could use dynamic rules to achieve what you require, for now.

Have a cmd.exe rule that chains to another rule which checks for a 200 OK from the webserver before it issues a final verdict on an alert.

According to the Snort docs on www.snort.org it seems dynamic rules will be phased out in favour of 'rule tagging' which i'd guess explains why rule chaining isn't used much in the current Snort ruleset (just my assumption, anyway).

Also the (upcoming) flow module might be of assistance to you here as well (http://www.snort.org/docs/writing_rules/chap2.html#tth_sEc2.3.36).

Snort v2.0 sounds very promising :-)




Regards,

Chris.


_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: