Snort mailing list archives
Re: spp_portscan behavior is 1.8.6
From: Edwin Eefting <edwin () bit nl>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 08:58:44 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 22 May 2002 17:25:52 -0700 Ryan Hill <rhill () xypoint com> wrote:
All, Is spp_portscan designed to report STEALTH scan detections regardless of the preprocessor ignore-hosts directive? I've got an IP which generates STEALTH packets and spp_portscan is reporting the event despite the fact the IP is entered into the ignore-hosts list and am wondering why this activity isn't being ignored.
I got this problem to. It seems the new code is still missing some if-blocks that should look at these settings, before calling the log functions. I just hacked them into the source at certain points and commented some stuff out.
Thanks, Ryan Hill Corporate Information Systems TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. (TCS) - http://www.telecomsys.com
-- __________________ Met vriendelijke groet, /\ ___/ Edwin Eefting /- \ _/ Business Internet Trends BV /--- \/ __________________ _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- spp_portscan behavior is 1.8.6 Ryan Hill (May 22)
- Re: spp_portscan behavior is 1.8.6 Edwin Eefting (May 23)