Snort mailing list archives
Performance.
From: Vjay LaRosa <vjayl () emc com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:09:04 -0500
O.Kay, I know that everyone probably hates this question, but I need to ask it any way. I am running four instances of snort. The first three run on a Fujitsu Prime Power M400, the fourth runs on a linux PC. On my Solaris host I have two 100MB cards that run close to 75% utilization each. Snort barely even drops a single packet ever from either of these cards. My third instance is reading off a Sun Gigabit card. This interface only peaks periodically at 2% utilization, but I drop hundreds of thousands of packets. I am using libpcap version 7.1, snort 1.8.4 beta 4. The snort process that is dropping all of the packets is only running at about 9% CPU utilization. I have tried reducing signatures, and removing output plugins, but nothing helps . Does anyone have any suggestions for me to try? Thanks! vjl -- V.Jay LaRosa EMC Corporation Systems Administrator 171 South Street (508)435-1000 ext 14957 Hopkinton, MA 01748 (508)497-8082 fax www.emc.com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Performance. Vjay LaRosa (Mar 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Performance. Vjay LaRosa (Mar 20)
- LOGSNORTER Gerardo Gregory (Mar 22)
- Re: Performance. Vjay LaRosa (Mar 20)
- Message not available
- analyse snort0305 () 1543 log Thorsten Weigl (Mar 21)
- Re: analyse snort0305 () 1543 log Chris Green (Mar 21)
- Re: analyse snort0305 () 1543 log Thorsten Weigl (Mar 21)
- Re: analyse snort0305 () 1543 log Chris Green (Mar 21)
- Re: analyse snort0305 () 1543 log Chris Green (Mar 21)