Snort mailing list archives
snort performance
From: Thomas Springer <tuev () serveraudit net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 13:27:09 +0100
I've got a performance-problem: We're running snort 1.8.3 on a Celeron 700/256MB RAM/Suse 7.3, monitoring a network with about 10 MBit/s IP-Traffic. We're using the standard-ruleset and the standard snort.conf, at the moment we log with "-A fast -b -d". Snort works fine, but it eats up between 50 and 99 percent CPU-time, regardless if I use standard-logging, -A fast -b or the output-unified-plugin. I even tried to exclude a big Gateway-Host with "not host fat_inet_gate" - this reduces traffic to approx 7 MBit/s, but the serverload stays the same. Are there any known ways to optimize performance and reduce serverload? I found, that un-defining a home-net reduces the cpu-load: "var HOME_NET [217.x.x.0/24,193.x.x.0/24]" means 60-90% cpu-load "var HOME_NET any" means 30-60% cpu-load Any hints for further optimizing ?? Will a rearrange of the rule application order help? I'm using the standard "->activation->dynamic->alert->pass->log" at the moment. ts Thomas Springer _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- snort performance Thomas Springer (Jan 09)