Snort mailing list archives
Re: 'kill snort-pid -USR1' returns unrealistic figures
From: Chris Green <cmg () uab edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:31:10 -0600
Bruno Vuillemin <Bruno.Vuillemin () unifr ch> writes:
Feb 11 17:03:48 snortBox snort: Snort analyzed -119209984 out of 16777216 packets, Feb 11 17:03:48 snortBox snort: dropping 135987200(810.547%) packets (...) These figures are impressive but don't seem very reliable.
[snip]
Nothing special about snort binaries: I read the docs, compiled it as recommended (unless
Linux Kernel version? Pcap version?
I missed something). snort 1.8.2.
do you see the same with http://www.snort.org/downloads/snort-stable-snapshot.tar.gz ? -- Chris Green <cmg () uab edu> "Yeah, but you're taking the universe out of context." _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- 'kill snort-pid -USR1' returns unrealistic figures Bruno Vuillemin (Feb 13)
- Re: 'kill snort-pid -USR1' returns unrealistic figures Chris Green (Feb 13)