Snort mailing list archives
Re: capturing a suspisous traffic stream
From: Chris Green <cmg () uab edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:28:39 -0500
"Stan Scalsky" <sscalsk () mail ameritel net> writes:
that is cool and just what I was looking to do also - how about in addition to # of seconds maybe # of packets? say "tag: session, 50, packets;" to grab up to the next 50 packets. or can i already do this elsewhere?
yes. With that same syntax. docs seem to be messed up on snort.org at the moment. We'll get that fixed. -- Chris Green <cmg () uab edu> "Not everyone holds these truths to be self-evident, so we've worked up a proof of them as Appendix A." -- Paul Prescod _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- capturing a suspisous traffic stream phillip mawson (Oct 22)
- Re: capturing a suspisous traffic stream Martin Roesch (Oct 22)
- Re: capturing a suspisous traffic stream Stan Scalsky (Oct 22)
- Re: capturing a suspisous traffic stream Chris Green (Oct 22)
- ip ranges? Edwin Eefting (Oct 23)
- Message not available
- ip ranges & perfomance Edwin Eefting (Oct 23)
- Re: capturing a suspisous traffic stream Stan Scalsky (Oct 22)
- Re: capturing a suspisous traffic stream Martin Roesch (Oct 22)