Snort mailing list archives
non-CIDR address masking in rules?
From: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <glratt () rice edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:58:58 -0600 (CST)
Is there a way to use address/mask pairs explicitly in a rule, rather than CIDR notation? Particularly, does snort have the capability to understand address/mask pairs that *don't* simplify to CIDR notation, eg: 172.16.4.0 0.0.8.255 => 172.16.4.0/24 or 172.16.12.0/24 or 172.16.0.250 0.0.255.15 => anything in 172.16.0.0/16 with a last octet > 239 ? -g Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt Rice University Network Management glratt () rice edu _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- non-CIDR address masking in rules? Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt (Nov 05)
- Re: non-CIDR address masking in rules? Andrew R. Baker (Nov 06)