Snort mailing list archives

Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss)


From: Jason Haar <Jason.Haar () trimble co nz>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:03:44 +1200

On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 07:18:43PM -0700, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
Quick Isolation Q?

Is everyone who is seeing this running under Linux?

Yeah. In case it will help, I just SIGUSR1'ed my running snort. Here's the
results (it's only been running since yesterday morning - I upgraded it
before the supposed Code Red onslaught)


===============================================================================
Snort analyzed 14083760 out of 14083760 packets, dropping 0(0.000%) packets

Breakdown by protocol:                Action Stats:
    TCP: 5455743    (38.738%)         ALERTS: 61        
    UDP: 142600     (1.013%)          LOGGED: 61        
   ICMP: 182873     (1.298%)          PASSED: 419651    
    ARP: 4252       (0.030%)
   IPv6: 0          (0.000%)
    IPX: 0          (0.000%)
  OTHER: 8293208    (58.885%)
DISCARD: 0          (0.000%)
===============================================================================
Fragmentation Stats:
Fragmented IP Packets: 20200      (0.143%)
   Rebuilt IP Packets: 5016      
   Frag elements used: 0         
Discarded(incomplete): 0         
   Discarded(timeout): 68        
===============================================================================



--dr

On Wed, 01 Aug 2001, Jason Haar wrote:
Can someone check this out? I've had snort running fine under Linux-2.4.x
for some time now, but now I'm running 1.8.1-beta5 I'm seeing the same thing.

Knowing CodeRed was out there, I checked my snort logs this morning to find
that our Apache (:-) server had received ONE CodeRed hit. That didn't seem
right so I checked it's logs. SIX hits.

As with Matthew, snort detected the first one, and missed the next five...

Sounds too much of a coincidence, anyone else see this?

More info. Snort detected and reported other scans between the first and
second CodeRed hits, so it was picking other things up...


Snort-1.8.1-beta5, with http://snort.sourceforge.net/snortrules.tar.gz rules
downloaded yesterday (yup, 20+ hours before CodeRed hit). Could the rules
themselves be at fault?

preprocessor stream4: detect_scans, keepstats, timeout 30, memcap 8388608
preprocessor stream4_reassemble: both, ports 21 23 25 53 80 3128 143 110 111
513
preprocessor unidecode: 80 3128 -unicode -cginull
preprocessor frag2




On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 12:05:20PM -0500, Chris Green wrote:
"Matthew Collins" <Matthew.Collins () northernregistrars co uk> writes:

I've got snort 1.7 running on a Linux 2.2.19 (Debian) system.

The code red worm is starting to get going now, and I've noticed an
oddity. I've got one alert for .ida attempt in my snort log


-- 
Cheers

Jason Haar

Unix/Special Projects, Trimble NZ
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
-- 
Dragos Ruiu <dr () dursec com>   dursec.com ltd. / kyx.net - we're from the future 
gpg/pgp key on file at wwwkeys.pgp.net or at http://dursec.com/drkey.asc

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

-- 
Cheers

Jason Haar

Unix/Special Projects, Trimble NZ
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: